Rethinking poverty: New research looks at deprivation beyond income level

Posted by Lance Wallace, Georgia Institute of Technology

Since social scientists and economists began measuring poverty, its definition has never strayed far from a discussion of income.

Now, new research shows there are multiple components of poverty that more accurately describe a household’s economic condition. “Deprivation” is more than simply low income, says Shatakshee Dhongde. Almost 15 percent of Americans are deprived in multiple dimensions.

“This study approaches poverty in a new way,” Dhongde says. “We tried to identify what is missing in the literature on poverty, and measure deprivation in six dimensions: health, education, standard of living, security, social connections, and housing quality. When you look at deprivation in these dimensions, you have a better picture of what is really going on with households, especially in developed countries like the United States.”

Tracking deprivation

Published in the journal Social Indicators Research, the study looks at deprivation in the US since the onset of the Great Recession, roughly 2008 to 2013. The source data for the study came from the American Community Survey conducted by the US Census Bureau.

The analysis shows that while the official income-based poverty rate averaged 13.2 percent from 2008 to 2013, the multi-dimensional deprivation index averaged 14.9 percent.

“Lack of education, severe housing burden, and lack of health insurance were some of the dimensions in which Americans were most deprived in,” Dhongde says. “Even though deprivation did increase during the recession, it began to improve between 2010 and 2013.”

When placed side-by-side, the multi-dimensional deprivation index was a better reflection of the people’s economic state than income alone. Further, the index was able to detect a more nuanced view of what might be driving people’s dissatisfaction.

Education, housing, health insurance

Interestingly, the study showed that there was not much overlap between individuals who were income poor and those who were multi-dimensionally deprived. Only 6.6 percent of the income poor were also deprived in multiple dimensions.

“Almost 30 percent of individuals with incomes slightly above the poverty threshold experienced multiple deprivations,” Dhongde says. “Our analysis underscores the need to look beyond income based poverty statistics in order to fully realize the impact of the recession on individual’s well-being.”

In order for a respondent to qualify as having multi-dimensional deprivation, he or she had to have more than one indicator of deprivation, such as lack of education and severe housing burden.

While research on deprivation has been growing in recent years in developing countries, this is the first time such an approach has been taken with poverty in the United States.

The study found the greatest deprivation in the US is in education, housing, and health insurance, and the greatest prevalence of deprivation was in the southern and western part of the country. The study specifically cited Asian and Hispanic populations as those experiencing the greatest prevalence of deprivation among ethnic groups.

Robert Haveman of the University of Wisconsin-Madison is coauthor of the study.

Bottom Line for Mentors and Programs

As this study shows, it is important to think about the challenges facing mentees and their families more comprehensively than through a strictly income-centric perspective. In approaching deprivation, mentors can directly influence one of the dimensions listed in this research: social connections. As this research and other studies have shown, having a supportive social connection is crucial in fostering positive outcomes for at-risk youth in the United States. Positive social support has ripple effects in other dimensions mentioned here, as well, particularly in education. Hardship in the United States comes in many forms, and being aware of the realities facing your mentee can go a long way in helping to build a trusting, understanding relationship between you and your mentee.

Original Study DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1379-1