Tony Jack on Equity in Higher Education
Ames, M. (2025, September 16). A voice for high-needs students: Talking with Tony Jack. LearningWell Magazine. https://learningwellmag.org/article/talking-with-tony-jack
In an interview with LearningWell Magazine, Anthony “Tony” Jack, Ph.D., situates his scholarship at the intersection of equity, access, and student wellbeing. Jack’s research examines how elite universities recruit lower-income students yet fail to support them once admitted, particularly those from economically distressed backgrounds. His recent work, including Class Dismissed (2024), traces how institutional structures exacerbate inequities: a problem illuminated by the COVID-19 pandemic and inadequate campus support.
Jack explains his theoretical framing by integrating findings from his books with lived experience as a first-generation student and institutional leader. He also describes programmatic implementation at the Newbury Center, a student services initiative at Boston University with the purpose of supporting first-generation, graduate, and professional learners.
His insights reveal consistent patterns: recruitment of disadvantaged students without adequate infrastructural support leads to ongoing inequity; pandemic conditions amplified preexisting disparities; and targeted services, such as stipends for unpaid internships, can partially mitigate structural barriers.
The author frames these results as a call for ethical, actionable research allied with student services. He argues that universities must move beyond recruitment metrics to holistic supports and that scholars should write accessibly to influence policy and practice.
Implications for Mentoring Programs
For mentoring and student support initiatives, Jack’s perspective emphasizes the need for context-responsive, equity-minded frameworks that recognize socioeconomic background, sustained guidance (not just access), and integration with institutional resources (e.g., stipends, mental health supports). Mentorship programs should be evaluated not only on participation rates but on long-term educational and wellbeing outcomes.
Read the full article here
