E-Mentoring: An Effective Bridge for Youth With Disabilities

Lindsay, S., Kolne, K., & Cagliostro, E. (2018). Electronic mentoring programs and interventions for children and youth with disabilities: Systematic review. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 1(2), e11679. https://doi.org/10.2196/11679

Introduction

Children and youth with disabilities often face social isolation and limited access to mentorship opportunities. Lindsay and colleagues (2018) addressed this gap through a systematic review examining whether electronic mentoring (e-mentoring) can provide accessible, effective support for this population.

Methods

Lindsay and colleagues (2018) conducted a systematic review of seven major databases, analyzing 25 peer-reviewed studies published between 1993 and 2018. These studies included 897 participants aged 12–26 with various disabilities, including cerebral palsy, spina bifida, and chronic illnesses. The interventions used diverse technologies—interactive websites, email, Skype, mobile apps, and virtual environments—and were delivered through one-to-one, group, or hybrid formats.

Results

Of the 11 studies that tested statistical significance, 9 (81%) reported meaningful improvements in at least one psychosocial or behavioral outcome. Reported benefits included higher self-determination, self-advocacy, self-confidence, career decision-making skills, and social connectedness. Programs using virtual environments and video-based mentorship were particularly effective in enhancing engagement and coping skills. Across formats, e-mentoring proved feasible and well-received by participants.

Discussion

Findings suggest that e-mentoring is a promising, adaptable model for supporting youth with disabilities, overcoming the physical and social barriers that limit traditional face-to-face mentoring. However, variability in program design and limited use of rigorous experimental methods warrant further research to isolate the most effective components.

Implications for Mentoring Programs

Practitioners designing mentoring programs should integrate flexible, technology-based formats and prioritize mentor-mentee matching based on shared experiences. Future initiatives should also address equity in technology access and examine outcomes across disability types and genders.

Find the article here